Final Results
Hambledon Mining PLC
PRESS INFORMATION 9 June 2009
HAMBLEDON MINING PLC
(AIM:HMB)
Final results
(All references to “£” are to the British pound and “ounces” are to troy
ounces)
Hambledon Mining plc (“Hambledon” or the “Group” or the “Company”), the
AIM-listed mining and exploration company developing precious metal
deposits in Kazakhstan, announces its results for the year ended 31
December 2008.
Highlights
-
11,939 ounces of gold and 21,644 ounces of silver produced during 2008.
-
Upgrade to the crusher completed in 2009.
-
Crushing circuit is now operating well.
-
Process plant now capable of achieving 33 per cent. greater throughput
than planned.
-
Underground mine study completed and underground permitting process
started.
The annual general meeting of the Company will be held at the offices of
Fairfax I.S. PLC at 46 Berkeley Square, Mayfair, London W1J 5AT on
Friday 17 July at 2.30 p.m.
Enquiries
|
Hambledon Mining plc
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles Zorab
|
|
|
|
Telephone: + 44 (0) 207 233 1462
|
|
|
|
Fairfax I.S. PLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ewan Leggat
|
|
|
|
Telephone: +44 (0) 207 598 5638
|
Chairman’s statement
I am pleased to announce our financial results for the twelve months to
31 December 2008.
Review of 2008 and 2009 to date
Sekisovskoye
Production in 2008 suffered from a number of significant disruptions. A
boiler explosion in February put the plant out of action for three
months while a new boiler was installed and new safety procedures put in
place. Subsequently, a number of problems, mainly concerning the
crushing circuit, continued to hinder our efforts to increase production
towards design levels. As a result, production levels during 2008 were
far lower than planned. However, I am pleased to report that following
the installation of new equipment earlier this year, the plant can now
operate at a throughput some 33 per cent. above the originally
anticipated level.
Having achieved this improvement in performance, our task is now to
ensure that the many advantages of Sekisovskoye - including the simple
metallurgy, proximity to infrastructure and availability of a skilled,
low cost workforce - are translated into financial benefits.
Ognevka
The combination of low metallurgical recoveries and the very severe drop
in metal prices caused us to abandon our initial plan to treat the small
quantity of copper-gold-silver bearing clinkers that were on-site at the
time of acquisition. We have carried out test work into the possibility
of treating the large quantities of existing tailings to produce a
saleable feldspar concentrate, and other uses for this process plant are
being considered, but for the present, the plant has been placed on care
and maintenance.
Outlook
Although the major causes of bottlenecks in production have been
resolved, we still have many things to achieve. Our process plant has
proven to be capable of operating satisfactorily at 33 per cent. higher
throughput rates than initially planned, but it remains to be
demonstrated that this can be done on a consistent basis. Metallurgical
recoveries have recently risen close to the anticipated level, but we
need to achieve this over a longer time-frame. The Group’s mining team
is working to increase mine production to cater for the increased
milling capacity, but equipment failures and long time-lines for the
procurement of spares have impeded us. We have reviewed and augmented
the list of spares which we carry on site, but there is further work to
be done to improve general efficiency. The geological model on which our
resource estimate is based, and the associated open pit mine plan, show
that the stripping ratio will fall and the ore grade will increase as
the pit deepens. These factors, combined with the greater efficiencies
now becoming apparent, should enable us to reach higher levels of
production from the open pit over the next few years.
We have employed an underground mine manager to oversee the permitting
processes for the start of underground mining. Although this project is
behind schedule, we need to ensure we have sufficient cash resources
before the equipment is ordered. Work on securing the necessary permits
has already started, and we see no reason why mining work should not
commence in the next twelve months.
We have studied various opportunities for expansion of the Group, either
using the Ognevka facility or additional gold opportunities which could
stand-alone or provide additional feed for our plant at Sekisovskoye.
The legal process whereby we may apply for suitable licences is slow,
but we have already held preliminary discussions with the appropriate
authorities.
We have spent considerable time and effort in making the business a more
efficient and productive operation. This has been at times frustrating,
none more so than for you as shareholders, but I believe we are at last
about to see the rewards of our labour.
I thank all shareholders for their considerable patience and the
management and staff for their efforts over the year.
George Eccles
8 June 2009
Review of operations
Sekisovskoye
Mining Operations
Open pit
Mining operations at the Sekisovskoye open pit progressed well during
2008. With the commencement of processing in December 2007, the focus of
the mining operation was to provide a steady supply of ore to the
processing plant while also continuing the construction of the tailings
storage facilities with the waste material mined from the pit.
Mining operations were suspended from mid February 2008 until the end of
April 2008 as a result of the plant shut down following the boiler
accident. There was a sufficient stockpile of ore for the process
operation so this did not impact gold production after the restart.
The construction of the second stage tailings storage facility with the
installation of the plastic lining was completed in August. This will
have sufficient capacity until around the end of 2009. Construction of
the third stage, with capacity for around 1½ years of tailings,
commenced in late 2008 and is expected to be completed in July 2009.
Construction of the final and largest stage will commence after the
completion of the third stage in late 2009.
A second Atlas Copco L7 blasthole drilling rig was purchased and
commissioned in May 2008. This machine was required to allow mining of
the high volume of waste material planned to be mined in 2008 and 2009.
In addition, we purchased a Hitachi Zaxis ZX200 fitted with a Montabert
900 rock breaker in June. While the main task of this machine is to
break the oversize ore generated from mining operations to a size that
can be fed to the jaw crusher, it will also be used for small scale
trenching operations.
Analysis of the mining operations at Sekisovskoye shows that the costs
associated with the operation of the mining fleet are lower than
initially projected, helped by the devaluation of the Kazakh tenge in
January 2009.
The characteristics of the pit design are such that the requirement for
waste stripping is currently at its highest, so the mine fleet cannot
easily provide the increased tonnage that the upgraded process plant can
now treat. The shortfall will be made up with lower grade marginal ore
that will nevertheless provide a useful contribution to profits. In
future years, this stripping requirement will fall, enabling a greater
tonnage of ore to be mined. The ore grade is also expected to rise
slightly with depth, giving a further boost to annual gold production.
Underground
The Company has started to develop the required documentation to be
presented to the Kazakhstan regulatory authorities for approval to
commence underground mining. This involves our team of planning
engineers and geologists converting the current design into a format
acceptable to the local authorities. We currently expect to commence
mine development with the construction of a surface decline from within
the existing open pit to intersect the old exploration level at an
elevation of 320 (120 metres below surface).
Discussions have been ongoing with suppliers to source the required
underground equipment to start development of the surface decline.
Previously indicated lead times of 9 to 12 months for the supply of this
equipment appear to have been significantly reduced.
The Company is working on a development schedule that will proceed in
stages to suit the approvals system operating in Kazakhstan and will use
more Russian and Chinese equipment. The likely up-front investment for
the first stage, including working capital, will be just US$3 million,
which we anticipate financing from internally generated cashflow.
Processing operations
Processing operations were carried out from January 2008 until mid
February when the eluate boiler in the gold recovery circuit suffered
catastrophic failure. The process plant was immediately shut down while
we carried out investigations and repairs.
The processing plant restarted operations in late April 2008 following
the installation and commissioning of a new boiler and heat exchanger.
Initial throughput was affected by the spring rains on the clay-like
material that had been mined from near-surface ore-zones, which hampered
the material’s flow through the conveyor systems and tended to clog the
sizing screens of the crushing plant. In winter, when temperatures
frequently reach -40 C, freezing of the natural moisture in the ore
caused further blockages and the widely fluctuating temperatures of
spring and autumn caused freezing of rain-soaked dust to further slow
down production. We attempted to modify the circuit to resolve these
issues but were only partially successful until in late 2008 we decided
to carry out a major upgrade of the crushing plant. Equipment was
ordered and arrived on site in early 2009. In February 2009 we suspended
the plant’s operations for a period so that all the new crusher
equipment could be installed. Commissioning problems encountered in the
start-up of the equipment in February and early March were quickly
resolved and the crushing circuit is now operating well, with production
consistently over 200 tonnes per hour, more than sufficient to supply
the process plant with the required feed.
The failure of the crushing plant to produce sufficient quantities of
material at an appropriate size limited milling operations throughout
2008. However, since the crusher upgrade in February 2009, we have
gradually increased the tonnage feed through the process plant to the
point where it is now able to operate satisfactorily at 140 tonnes per
hour, some 33 per cent. above the design capacity, making possible an
annual throughput of in excess of 1 million tonnes. Output will now be
limited by the amount and grade of ore that the mine can supply.
The current annualised production rate is around 30,000 ounces per year,
but the average from the open pit is expected to average over 40,000
ounces per year over the pit life, while combined open pit and
underground production is expected to reach around 100,000 ounces per
year.
Gold recovery in the leaching circuit during 2008 at 73 per cent. was
lower than budgeted. The principal cause of this was the failure to
achieve the planned performance in the gravity and intensive leaching
circuit. During the February 2009 plant shut down the manufacturer
overhauled and upgraded the Falcon gravity concentrator. As a result,
gold recovery is much improved and there are indications that this will
tend to increase with increasing ore grade, as is expected as the pit
deepens. We are therefore on track to achieve the predicted recovery of
92 per cent. over the life of the pit.
All other areas of the processing plant are functioning according to the
design parameters.
Production statistics
Mining
|
Ore mined
|
|
587,514
|
|
t
|
|
Gold grade
|
|
1.24
|
|
g/t
|
|
Silver grade
|
|
2.34
|
|
g/t
|
|
Contained gold
|
|
23,422
|
|
oz
|
|
Contained silver
|
|
44,200
|
|
oz
|
|
Waste mined
|
|
1,507,212
|
|
t
|
Processing
|
Crushing
|
|
417,990
|
|
t
|
|
Milling
|
|
392,485
|
|
t
|
|
Gold grade
|
|
1.37
|
|
g/t
|
|
Silver grade
|
|
2.58
|
|
g/t
|
|
Gold recovery
|
|
75.1
|
|
per cent.
|
|
Silver recovery
|
|
69.7
|
|
per cent.
|
|
Gold poured
|
|
11,939
|
|
oz
|
|
Silver poured
|
|
21,644
|
|
oz
|
The above statistics are for the year ended 31 December 2008.
Ognevka
The Ognevka processing facility restarted in early December 2007 and
operated through to the middle of 2008. During this time, copper / gold
and silver concentrate and a separate carbon concentrate were produced
but at a lower grade than is acceptable in current market conditions.
With the collapse in the copper price in late 2008, following a review
of the economics of the operation, management halted operations. In
light of this suspension, it was decided to make an impairment provision
in the consolidated financial statements of £1.7 million against the
assets of the business.
The company undertook metallurgical testwork to determine the viability
of reprocessing the tailings of the pegmatite material which were
produced from previous operations at Ognevka until the late 1990’s.
There currently exists approximately 9.7 million tonnes of tailings in
the storage facility containing potentially economic quantities of
lithium, beryllium and feldspar. The testwork demonstrated that it is
technically feasible to extract a feldspar concentrate as well as a
concentrate containing lithium and beryllium. However, in the current
recessionary conditions prices would be inadequate.
There are a number of other potential uses of the Ognevka facility in
treating many types of primary base and precious metal ores, and these
are currently being examined.
Exploration
The priority given to resolving production issues at Sekisovskoye
restrained exploration activity in 2008 but a limited amount of
exploration was carried out at Tserkovka. Though no significant
discoveries were made, we plan to undertake bulk sampling of the surface
exposure of its ore zones. By extracting and processing a total of 2,200
tonnes of ore at an expected grade of 2.45 grammes per tonne, we will
determine the grade more accurately than is possible from sampling in
this highly variable deposit. Former Soviet assessments showed higher
grades and tonnes. If the bulk sampling exercise proves successful,
further exploration will be carried out. In accordance with the terms of
the subsoil use licence 30 per cent. of the 29 square kilometres of
licensed territory at Tserkovka has been relinquished.
At Sekisovskoye, once we have established the initial underground
decline, we plan to drill 183 holes totaling 24,000 metres from the
320m, 240m and 120m levels in order to upgrade the reliability of the
resource estimate and as part of the project approval process.
Test-mining will take place on orebody 11 from level 240m up to level
400m.
Our geologists have been researching other potential deposits which
might be available in Kazakhstan, either by taking new licences from
government or by contract with existing owners. Several potential
targets have been identified and initial discussions have been held with
the appropriate authorities. For the present, the government of
Kazakhstan has suspended such negotiations generally, although we expect
them to restart later this year.
Risks, uncertainties and performance indicators
The main risks and uncertainties facing the Sekisovskoye operation
include the following:
1 The risk of production being affected by failures of vital equipment.
2 The risk of failing to mine the tonnes and grades of ore predicted by
the geological model.
3 The risk of failing to obtain the metallurgical recoveries predicted
by test-work.
4 The risk of operating costs being significantly different from those
predicted.
5 The risk of operations being affected by events outside the control of
the Company such as major infrastructure failures or political upheaval.
6 Gold and silver prices.
Risks one to four are reducing at Sekisovskoye as, over time, the
operation’s performance is monitored against plan. An analysis of
equipment performance has been carried out and defects rectified and
critical spares identified and procured. The implementation of a
detailed costing system has allowed the monitoring and assessment of
costs to be undertaken. The grade of ore mined is constantly compared to
the geological model and differences investigated.
The key performance indicators used to monitor the performance of the
operations are:
1 Tonnes and grade of ore mined.
2 Tonnes processed.
3 Metallurgical recovery.
4 Gold and silver produced.
5 Cost per unit of production.
6 Safety of the Group’s employees.
Key performance indicators one to four are set out in the tables of
production statistics.
The Ognevka plant is currently on care and maintenance due to the
current low world metal prices. It is not possible to predict if and
when economic conditions will be sufficiently favourable for it to be
reopened.
The Group is monitoring the environmental impact of its operations in
compliance with an agreed monitoring programme.
Employee safety is of paramount concern to the Group and the board of
directors receives regular updates on safety matters.
Going concern
The Group’s business activities, together with the factors likely to
affect its future development, performance and position are set out in
the Chairman’s statement and review of operations and exploration above.
The major risks and uncertainties which could impact on the Group’s
ability to generate cash in the next 12 months are its level of
production and gold prices.
Mining operations at Sekisovskoye is the Group’s only source of revenue.
The Directors believe that production at or above the levels achieved
from April 2009 and up to the date of this report are sustainable
following the major improvements made to the processing operations and
measures to guard against significant production interruptions
introduced in the first quarter of 2009 as discussed in the review of
operations and exploration.
The Group’s forecasts and projections based on the assumption that the
current level of production at Sekisovskoye can be sustained and on the
prevailing outlook for the gold price and taking into account of
reasonably likely changes in the level of production and gold prices
show that the Group will now be cash generative for the foreseeable
future and its borrowings can be repaid before it falls due at the end
of 2009. The Directors believe that the Group’s low level of gearing
relative to the value of its assets would put it in a strong position,
were any additional funding to be required.
Accordingly, at the time of approving the consolidated financial
statements, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group
has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the
foreseeable future. For this reason the Directors continue to adopt the
going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
Mineral resources
Resource statement
This mineral resource estimate for the Sekisovskoye deposit has been
prepared under the JORC Code. Mining operations commenced in mid 2006.
Ore has been mined during 2007 and 2008. The following resource table
reflects the depletion of the resource due to open pit mining activities.
The underground resource is unchanged since the update reported in
September 2006.
|
Location
|
|
Resource
Category
|
|
Tonnes
(millions)
|
|
Au g/t
|
|
Contained
Metal
Au oz *
|
|
Ag g/t
|
|
Contained
Metal
Ag oz *
|
|
Au g/t
Cut-off
|
|
Open pit area
|
|
Indicated
|
|
8.91
|
|
1.8
|
|
521,999
|
|
3.0
|
|
859,360
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
Inferred (b)
|
|
6.06
|
|
1.8
|
|
350,700
|
|
2.0
|
|
389,667
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
Indicated
|
|
2.21
|
|
5.1
|
|
362,371
|
|
6.2
|
|
440,529
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
Inferred (b)
|
|
7.16
|
|
5.2
|
|
1,197,036
|
|
7.1
|
|
1,634,415
|
|
|
Marginal
underground (a)
|
|
Indicated
|
|
3.40
|
|
0.7
|
|
76,519
|
|
1.4
|
|
153,037
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
Inferred
|
|
0.96
|
|
0.6
|
|
18,519
|
|
1.2
|
|
37,038
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
Indicated
|
|
14.52
|
|
2.0
|
|
960,889
|
|
3.1
|
|
1,452,926
|
|
|
|
|
Inferred
|
|
14.18
|
|
3.4
|
|
1,566,255
|
|
4.5
|
|
2,061,120
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Indicated & Inferred
|
|
28.70
|
|
2.7
|
|
2,527,144
|
|
3.8
|
|
3,514,046
|
|
|
*Troy oz = 31.10348 grams
(a) underground low grade material associated with high grade
gold zones.
(b) includes resources that have been defined beyond the
current limits of the grade model.
Note: “Inferred” resources cannot be used for ore reserves until they
have been upgraded.
Reserve estimate
This ore reserve estimate of the Sekisovskoye deposit has been prepared
under the JORC Code.
|
Location
|
|
Reserve
Category
|
|
Tonnes
(millions)
|
|
Au g/t
|
|
Contained
Metal
Au oz *
|
|
Ag g/t
|
|
Contained
Metal
Ag oz *
|
|
Au g/t
Cut-off
|
|
Open pit area
|
|
Probable
|
|
3.54
|
|
1.61
|
|
183,447
|
|
2.52
|
|
286,500
|
|
0.5
|
|
Underground
|
|
Probable
|
|
1.77
|
|
4.4
|
|
247,908
|
|
7.4
|
|
421,556
|
|
2.0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431,355
|
|
|
|
708,056
|
|
|
*Troy oz = 31.10348 grams
The Sekisovskoye open pit ore reserve model is based on the ordinary
kriging of the mineral resource model using a 0.5 grams per tonne
cut-off, taking into consideration the expected dilution and losses.
Whittle optimisations resulted in a pit shell containing 7.25 million
tonnes of ore representing a conversion of 76 per cent. of the indicated
resource to probable reserve in this area. However, development of this
pit shell would have resulted in the loss of the existing underground
infrastructure and made the process of bringing the underground
operation into production much more difficult and on a much longer
timeframe. It has therefore been decided to leave the existing 320 level
intact and access this level from a decline developed from outside the
pit limit. This will allow the western ore bodies to be mined from
underground concurrently with the open pit and other ore zones below the
pit bottom at the 340 level, which might otherwise have been included in
the open pit mine plan, to be mined from underground.
The resultant reserve estimate is calculated by applying mining costs,
mining dilution (4 per cent.) and recoveries (97.5 per cent.) to that
portion of the Indicated Resource falling entirely within the optimised
open pit design. The area of this open pit reserve is contained within
the mineral resource as reported above.
The Sekisovskoye underground ore reserve has been determined from the
mine design work carried out as a part of the evaluation on the
development of the underground project using a 2.0 gram per tonne
cut-off. The General Resource Estimate covered both the open pit
resource and underground resource. Mine designs were therefore required
for both the open pit and the underground areas.
The underground reserve estimate is calculated by applying mining costs,
mining dilution (8 per cent.) and recoveries (96 per cent.) to that
portion of the Indicated Resource falling entirely within the stope
design. The area of this underground reserve is contained within the
underground mineral resource as reported above.
Reconciliation
Mining of ore is carried out following the completion of grade control
drilling. This is carried out using the Atlas Copco L7 CR drill rigs.
The resulting assays are modeled using Datamine software to produce a
Grade Control model. This Grade Control Model is reconciled back to the
JORC model prior to mining to determine the accuracy of the original
model. A reconciliation of the comparison of the Grade Control Model to
the JORC model reveals the following.
|
Model Type
|
|
Tonnes
|
|
Au g/t
|
|
Au oz *
|
|
Ag
g/t
|
|
Ag oz *
|
|
Au g/t
Cut-off
|
|
Grade – actual **
|
|
751,200
|
|
1.52
|
|
37,710
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
0.5
|
|
JORC – depleted
|
|
644,600
|
|
1.48
|
|
30,672
|
|
2.98
|
|
30,721
|
|
0.5
|
*Troy oz = 31.10348 grams
** The in situ grade control model result is based on vertical rotary
drill-hole sample data, for 2007 to end December 2008, and grade model
blocks are 2.5m3 using a bulk density of 2.83.
‘Nearest Neighbour’ grade interpolation was used for assigning grades
to the model blocks.
The above grade control results are based on 23,000 samples, so
statistically the results are significant. Overall, the JORC model shows
a reasonably good spatial correlation with the grade control resource
model and, as expected, “actual” tonnes and grade are higher than the
JORC resource.
The actual grade for Silver is not given in the above table as the
Company does not assay silver.
Glossary of technical terms
|
Grade
|
|
The tenor or concentration by weight of a metal in a mineral deposit
or ore
|
|
Indicated Resource
|
|
A category of Mineral Resource of higher confidence than an Inferred
Resource, the estimation of which is prescribed by the JORC Code.
This is the minimum level of resource classification required for
Ore Reserve estimation under the JORC Code.
|
|
Inferred Resource
|
|
A category of Mineral Resource the estimation of which is prescribed
by the JORC Code. Inferred Resources cannot be used as a basis for
Ore Reserve estimation.
|
|
JORC Code
|
|
Australasian Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral
Resources and Ore Reserves (Joint Ore Reserves Committee). See
www.jorc.org/main.php
|
|
Kriging
|
|
A class of methods of estimating mathematically the distribution of
a metal in three dimensions within the earth, together with the
confidence of the estimate
|
|
Mineral Resource
|
|
An estimated tonnage and grade of mineralisation in the ground
determined as prescribed by the JORC Code
|
|
Ore Reserve
|
|
That part of a Mineral Resource which can be demonstrated to be
worked profitably when all modifying factors are taken into account.
|
|
Tonne
|
|
A metric tonne of 1000 kilograms
|
Qualified persons
The resource estimates has been prepared by Roger Rhodes BSc, MSc,
MIMMM, independent geological consultant with Computer Resource
Services. He has over 35 years of relevant experience and is a qualified
person for the purpose of reporting resources under the JORC Code and
the AIM rules.
The reserve estimate has been prepared by Neil Stevenson, FAusIMM. He is
a full-time Director of the Company and has sufficient experience which
is relevant to the style of mining that is planned and is a qualified
person for the purpose of reporting resources under the JORC Code and
the AIM rules.
|
Group income statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
year ended 31 December 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
£000
|
|
£000
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
5,553
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
(7,727
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loss
|
|
|
|
(2,174
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
(3,154
|
)
|
|
(4,150
|
)
|
|
Other operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
Impairment of TOO Ognevka
|
|
|
|
(1,679
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
|
(7,007
|
)
|
|
(4,377
|
)
|
|
|
|
Investment revenues
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
Other gains and losses
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
|
Loss before taxation
|
|
|
|
(7,063
|
)
|
|
(4,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
Taxation
|
|
3
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Loss attributable to equity shareholders
|
|
|
|
(7,624
|
)
|
|
(4,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
Loss per ordinary share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
5
|
|
(1.65
|
)p
|
|
(1.04
|
)p
|
|
Diluted
|
|
5
|
|
(1.65
|
)p
|
|
(1.04
|
)p
|
All results are derived from continuing activities.
|
Group statement of recognised income and expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
year ended 31 December 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
£000
|
|
£000
|
|
Currency translation differences on foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
currency net investments
|
|
4,751
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net profit / (loss) recognised directly in equity
|
|
4,751
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
Loss for the year
|
|
(7,624
|
)
|
|
(4,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total recognised expense for the year attributable
|
|
|
|
|
|
to equity shareholders
|
|
(2,873
|
)
|
|
(4,398
|
)
|
|
Group balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
£000
|
|
£000
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
20,361
|
|
|
17,424
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
3,393
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
536
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
|
|
|
5,567
|
|
|
6,393
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
25,928
|
|
|
23,817
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
(1,626
|
)
|
|
(723
|
)
|
|
Provisions
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(2,143
|
)
|
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net current assets
|
|
3,424
|
|
|
5,553
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and payables
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
Deferred taxation
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
(1,004
|
)
|
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,194
|
)
|
|
(1,227
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
(4,337
|
)
|
|
(2,067
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net assets
|
|
21,591
|
|
|
21,750
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Called – up share capital
|
|
469
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
Share premium
|
|
31,317
|
|
|
28,707
|
|
|
Merger reserve
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
Other reserves
|
|
170
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
Currency translation reserve
|
|
3,629
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
|
Accumulated losses
|
|
(13,846
|
)
|
|
(6,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
21,591
|
|
|
21,750
|
|
|
Group cash flow statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
£000
|
|
£000
|
|
Net cash outflow from operating activities
|
|
|
|
(3,895
|
)
|
|
(5,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
Proceeds on disposal of property plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Purchase of intangible exploration assets
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
(2,123
|
)
|
|
(7,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
(2,020
|
)
|
|
(7,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on issue of shares
|
|
|
|
2,631
|
|
|
12,099
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
New bank loans
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Repayment of related party loan
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net cash inflow from financing activities
|
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
11,791
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
(2,928
|
)
|
|
(1,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
|
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
|
4,352
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rates changes
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
Notes
1 General information
Hambledon Mining plc (the “Company”) is a company incorporated in
England and Wales. The address of the registered office is Daws House,
33-35 Daws Lane, London, NW7 4SD. The principal activities and place of
business of the Company and its subsidiaries (“the Group”) are set out
in the chairman’s statement and the review of operations above.
2 Basis of preparation of financial information
The financial information set out above, which was approved by the Board
on 5 June 2009, has been compiled in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), but does not contain sufficient
information to comply with IFRS. The Company expects to distribute its
full financial statements that comply with IFRS in June 2009. As set out
in the review of operations, the board of directors assessed the ability
of the Group to continue as a going concern, and consequently the
financial statements of the Group have been prepared on a going concern
basis.
The financial information set out above does not constitute the
Company's statutory accounts for the year ended 31 December 2008 for the
purpose of Section 240 of the Companies Act 1985 which comply with IFRS,
but is extracted from those accounts. The Company's statutory accounts
for the year ended 31 December 2008 will be filed with the Registrar of
Companies following the Company’s annual general meeting. The
independent auditors' report on those accounts was unqualified and did
not contain any statement under Section 237(2) or (3) of the Companies
Act 1985. The Company's statutory accounts for the year ended 31
December 2007 have been filed with the Registrar of Companies. The
independent auditors' report on those accounts was unqualified and did
not contain any statement under Section 237(2) or (3) of the Companies
Act 1985.
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost
convention except for the treatment of share based payments.
3 Taxation
An analysis of the taxation charge is as follows:
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
£000
|
|
£000
|
|
|
Current taxation
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Deferred taxation
|
|
561
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
–
|
|
4 Dividend
The Directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend (2007 – nil).
5 Basic and diluted loss per share
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share is based on the
retained loss for the financial year.
The weighted average number of ordinary shares for calculating the basic
loss per share and diluted loss per share after adjusting for the
effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares are as follows:
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
461,031,025
|
|
422,403,465
|
|
6 Annual general meeting
The annual general meeting of the Company will be held at the offices of
Fairfax I.S. PLC at 46 Berkeley Square, Mayfair, London W1J 5AT on
Friday 17 July at 2.30 pm.
Company Information
|
Directors
|
|
George William O’Neale Eccles
|
|
|
|
Non-executive chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas John Bridgen
|
|
|
|
Chief executive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neil Stevenson
|
|
|
|
Technical director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher James Thomas
|
|
|
|
Non-executive director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baurzhan Yerkeyev
|
|
|
|
Executive director
|
|
|
|
Secretary
|
|
William Roy Morgan B. Sc. ACA
|
|
|
|
Registered office
|
|
Daws House
|
|
|
|
33-35 Daws Lane
|
|
|
|
London NW7 4SD
|
|
|
|
Telephone +44 (0) 870 111 8778
|
|
|
|
Web
|
|
www.hambledon-mining.com
|
|
|
|
Kazakhstan office
|
|
4th floor
|
|
|
|
83 Protozanova Street
|
|
|
|
Ust Kamenigorsk
|
|
|
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
|
|
Telephone: +7 (0) 72331 27928
|
|
|
|
Fax: +7 (0) 72331 27933
|
|
|
|
Nominated advisor and
|
|
Fairfax I.S. PLC
|
|
broker
|
|
46 Berkeley Square
|
|
|
|
Mayfair
|
|
|
|
London W1J 5AT
|
|
|
|
Telephone: +44 (0) 207 598 5368
|
|
|
|
Investor relations
|
|
Charles Zorab
|
|
|
|
Telephone: +44 (0) 207 233 1462
|
|
|
|
Registrars
|
|
Neville Registrars
|
|
|
|
18 Laurel Lane
|
|
|
|
Halesowen
|
|
|
|
West Midlands B63 3DA.
|